Sagging pants on Board's agenda

Youngsters and others who participate in what could be called a fading fad and a fashion faux pas might want to get their belts ready. Braddock County Board of Commissioners is expected to discuss an ordinance amendment concerning sagging pants when it meets today.

The amendment being proposed by Councilwoman T. Diana Belle-Little would make it unlawful for any person to appear in public wearing pants below the waist that expose skin or undergarments.

The proposed amendment is something Little said has been on her mind for a while, though it wasn't sparked by any earth-shattering incident. "I think it's important for us to speak on behavior," Little said, noting the proposed rule isn't a restraint of free speech. Sagging pants is one of the things that concerned Little during her time as a public defender. "It's not something we'd like to see happen."

The ordinance amendment, which can't be adopted prior to Aug. 28, was introduced during Monday's Board work session, but there was no discussion on the issue during the meeting. If it gets board members' approval, anyone convicted of violations could face a fine of up to $25 and up to one eight-hour day picking up trash or refuse, or performing court-appointed community service activities. Repeated convictions could result in a fine of up to $100 and up to four eight-hour days picking up trash or other court-appointed community service activities. "Like most folks, I'm offended by the young folks in the city when they choose to wear their pants in that fashion," said Braddock Mayor Henry Wise. "I'm going to listen to the debate offered." But the proposed change already is drawing backers. "I'm definitely in support of that legislation," Councilman Benjamin White said.

Mansfield, LA aldermen voted Monday to enact a law that imposes a fine of up to $150 plus court costs, or up to 15 days in jail, for anyone caught wearing sagging pants with exposed underwear. The law becomes effective Sept. 15.

In other business during Monday's session, board members continued efforts to clean up the county when they considered property standards appeals. Of the six appeals before the County Council, one person wanted to donate the property to the city and the rest requested more time to either renovate or demolish the properties. Of the requests, council members opted to uphold the decision of the property standards board in denying the requests with the exception of one property. "These houses are in horrible condition," said Councilwoman Little, referring to the Happy Hill neighborhood.